Katkat

practice a little every day, paws crossed ♡

Interview Questions

Practice 9403 coding, system design and machine learning questions from 546 companies, sorted by role, topic and interview round. Every question has step-by-step hints, a code runner that supports 8 languages and an AI mentor; members also get the full solution walkthrough.

9403
Questions
546
Companies
11
Topics
8
Languages

Showing 2041–2070 of 3640 results

  • MetaMediumSoftware Engineer
    Discuss a Disagreement with a Teammate

    This question assesses the candidate's ability to navigate professional conflict, prioritize team goals over personal ego, and maintain effective working relationships through data-driven communication.

    Behavioral & LeadershipOnsiteConflict ResolutionCollaborationCommunication
  • MetaMediumSoftware Engineer
    Discuss achievements, ambiguity handling, growth, and conflict management

    Discuss achievements, ambiguity handling, growth, and conflict management evaluates behavioral evidence, ownership, communication, trade-offs, and measurable outcomes in a realistic interview setting. A strong answer states assumptions, handles edge cases, explains trade-offs, and shows how to validate the result clearly.

    Behavioral & LeadershipOnsite
  • MetaMediumData Scientist
    Ensure Effective Teamwork Amid Conflicting Stakeholder Opinions

    This interview question evaluates behavioral evidence, ownership, communication, trade-offs, and measurable outcomes in a realistic interview setting. A strong answer for Ensure Effective Teamwork Amid Conflicting Stakeholder Opinions states assumptions, handles edge cases, explains trade-offs, and shows how to validate the result clearly.

    Behavioral & LeadershipOnsite
  • MetaHardData Scientist
    Estimate CTR lift with binomial tests and errors

    This question evaluates statistical inference for proportions, sequential monitoring, and multiple-comparison error control—assessing competence with binomial-based CTR comparison, pooled standard errors, z-tests and confidence intervals, Type I error inflation from peeking, and FWER/FDR considerations.

    Statistics & MathOnsite
  • MetaMediumData Scientist
    Estimate Lift and Significance in Facebook Ad Campaigns

    Meta statistics prompt on Facebook ad conversion lift, covering absolute and relative lift, two-proportion tests, confidence intervals, power for 5% relative lift, and Bayesian beta-binomial reframing.

    Statistics & MathOnsite
  • MetaMediumData Scientist
    Estimate bots and CI from DAU spike

    This question tests the ability to decompose a mixture of legitimate user traffic and synthetic bot/CI traffic using statistical modeling, and requires justifying the choice of distribution for overdispersed count data.

    Statistics & MathOnsiteMixture ModelsNegative BinomialBootstrapping
  • MetaMediumData Scientist
    Estimate fake-account prevalence with capture-recapture

    This question tests the ability to apply the Lincoln-Petersen estimator to estimate a hidden population size and addresses the limitations of the assumptions underlying capture-recapture methods.

    Statistics & MathOnsiteStatisticsEstimationInference
  • MetaHardData Scientist
    Estimate revenue of organic shopping tab

    This question evaluates a data scientist's skills in revenue modeling, funnel construction, causal inference for bias correction, experimentation scaling, and sensitivity analysis using organic engagement and purchase metrics.

    Analytics & ExperimentationOnsite
  • MetaHardData Scientist
    Estimate variance for ratio metrics

    This question evaluates statistical inference and experimental-analysis skills for data scientists, including variance estimation for ratio metrics via the delta method, covariance estimation from sample moments, model-based comparisons (ANCOVA/log models with offsets), bootstrap and t-test inference considerations, and robustness techniques for heavy-tailed revenue such as winsorization and robust M-estimators. It is commonly asked to assess both theoretical derivation and practical estimation trade-offs in A/B or experimental settings; the category is Statistics & Math and the level of abstraction spans conceptual understanding and practical application.

    Statistics & MathOnsite
  • MetaMediumData Scientist
    Evaluate AI-assisted ad creation

    This question evaluates competency in product analytics, experimentation design, causal inference, metric definition, and measurement of downstream business and user-quality impacts for an AI-assisted advertising feature.

    Analytics & ExperimentationOnsite
  • MetaEasyData Scientist
    Evaluate AI-assisted ads creation feature

    This question assesses the ability to design an A/B test for a new AI feature, focusing on metric definition, experiment design, and mitigating potential trade-offs between advertiser efficiency and ad quality.

    Analytics & ExperimentationOnsiteA/B TestingProduct MetricsExperiment Design
  • MetaHardData Scientist
    Evaluate Factors Before Replacing Recommendation Model

    Evaluates whether an ads recommendation model should replace an existing production model. Strong answers combine offline validation, online experiments, revenue and advertiser outcomes, user guardrails, conflicting metric interpretation, rollout safety, rollback planning, and executive communication.

    Machine LearningOnsite
  • MetaMediumData Scientist
    Evaluate Fake-Account Classifier with Precision and Recall Metrics

    This interview question evaluates core ML concepts, assumptions, math intuition, training/evaluation trade-offs, and practical failure modes in a realistic interview setting. A strong answer for Evaluate Fake-Account Classifier with Precision and Recall Metrics states assumptions, handles edge cases, explains trade-offs, and shows how to validate the result clearly.

    Machine LearningOnsite
  • MetaMediumData Scientist
    Evaluate Instagram's Short-Video Recommender System Success

    Evaluates success metrics and experimentation for Instagram's short-video recommender feed. Strong answers choose a durable user-value metric, understand heavy-tailed engagement distributions, handle metric trade-offs, and outline a safe A/B test with retention, safety, creator, and app-level guardrails.

    Analytics & ExperimentationOnsite
  • MetaMediumData Scientist
    Evaluate Marketing Campaign's Click-Through Rate Effectiveness

    This interview question evaluates statistical assumptions, formulas, estimation strategy, uncertainty, edge cases, and interpretation in a realistic interview setting. A strong answer for Evaluate Marketing Campaign's Click-Through Rate Effectiveness states assumptions, handles edge cases, explains trade-offs, and shows how to validate the result clearly.

    Statistics & MathOnsite
  • MetaHardData Scientist
    Evaluate Messenger's P2P Payments Feature for Business Viability

    Evaluates business viability for a Messenger P2P payments feature. Strong answers define networked adoption and transfer metrics, assess fraud, compliance, support, trust, and unit economics, and propose a beta or experiment design that handles spillovers and contamination.

    Analytics & ExperimentationOnsite
  • MetaHardData Scientist
    Evaluate New Ad Model with A/B Testing Experiment

    This interview question evaluates metric design, causal reasoning, experiment setup, diagnostics, SQL/statistical checks, and recommendations in a realistic interview setting. A strong answer for Evaluate New Ad Model with A/B Testing Experiment states assumptions, handles edge cases, explains trade-offs, and shows how to validate the result clearly.

    Analytics & ExperimentationOnsite
  • MetaMediumData Scientist
    Evaluate Probability of Positive User Comments and Model Performance

    Evaluate Probability of Positive User Comments and Model Performance evaluates statistical assumptions, formulas, estimation strategy, uncertainty, edge cases, and interpretation in a realistic interview setting. A strong answer states assumptions, handles edge cases, explains trade-offs, and shows how to validate the result clearly.

    Statistics & MathOnsite
  • MetaMediumData Scientist
    Evaluate a New Ads-Ranking Algorithm

    This question tests the ability to design a robust A/B test for an ads-ranking system while accounting for interference effects, budget constraints, and conflicting metric signals.

    Analytics & ExperimentationOnsiteA/B TestingAd-TechMetrics
  • MetaMediumSoftware Engineer
    Evaluate arithmetic expression without parentheses

    Evaluate arithmetic expression without parentheses evaluates algorithm design, data structures, correctness, complexity, edge cases, and implementation details in a realistic interview setting. A strong answer states assumptions, handles edge cases, explains trade-offs, and shows how to validate the result clearly.

    Coding & AlgorithmsOnsite
  • MetaMediumData Scientist
    Evaluate fake accounts and ad creation

    This question tests the ability to design an evaluation framework for identifying malicious actors in an ad-tech environment and measuring the performance of automated content generation tools.

    Analytics & ExperimentationOnsiteAnalyticsExperimentationMetric Design
  • MetaHardData Engineer
    Evaluate impact of short videos in feed

    This question evaluates competency in metrics definition, causal experimentation, product analytics, and feed system behavior within the System Design and Data Engineering domain.

    System DesignOnsite
  • MetaHardData Scientist
    Evaluate the Health of Facebook Groups

    Evaluates Facebook Group health metrics and threaded-comments experiment design. Strong answers define normalized health scores, compare small and large groups fairly, and test deep interaction with safety guardrails.

    Analytics & ExperimentationOnsite
  • MetaMediumSoftware Engineer
    Execute Dependency-Constrained Work at Scale

    This problem tests the ability to design an execution engine that manages task dependencies using a directed acyclic graph (DAG), respects concurrency limits, and handles task failures.

    Software Engineering FundamentalsOnsiteConcurrencyGraphSystem Design
  • MetaMediumSoftware Engineer
    Explain ACID and isolation levels

    This question evaluates a candidate's knowledge of database transactions, the ACID properties (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability), and common isolation levels (Read Uncommitted, Read Committed, Repeatable Read, Serializable), testing competency in concurrency control and data consistency.

    Software Engineering FundamentalsOnsite
  • MetaEasyData Scientist
    Explain Central Limit Theorem's Importance in A/B Testing

    Evaluates understanding of the Central Limit Theorem and confidence intervals in A/B testing. Strong answers explain sampling distributions, standard error, normal approximations for experiment metrics, caveats for dependence and heavy tails, and compute the 95% confidence interval as [2.902, 3.098].

    Statistics & MathOnsite
  • MetaMediumSoftware Engineer
    Explain Collaboration, Ambiguity, and Prioritization

    This question assesses a candidate's ability to navigate cross-functional friction, synthesize ambiguous project requirements into actionable tasks, and demonstrate maturity in making trade-offs under pressure.

    Behavioral & LeadershipOnsiteBehavioralLeadershipStakeholder Management
  • MetaMediumSoftware Engineer
    Explain Your Highest-Impact Project

    Tests an experienced engineer's ability to articulate business and technical impact, demonstrate end-to-end ownership, justify complex architectural trade-offs, and quantify measurable outcomes.

    Behavioral & LeadershipOnsiteBehavioralLeadershipImpact
  • MetaMediumSoftware Engineer
    Explain a Failure and What You Changed

    This question evaluates your ability to take personal ownership of a significant technical or project failure, analyze root causes without deflecting blame, and implement lasting systemic improvements.

    Behavioral & LeadershipOnsiteBehavioralLeadershipPost-Mortem
  • MetaMediumSoftware Engineer
    Explain behavioral experiences and decisions

    Explain behavioral experiences and decisions evaluates behavioral evidence, ownership, communication, trade-offs, and measurable outcomes in a realistic interview setting. A strong answer states assumptions, handles edge cases, explains trade-offs, and shows how to validate the result clearly.

    Behavioral & LeadershipOnsite