Katkat
Back

Justify Building an In-House System Instead of Adopting an Existing Solution

CoreweaveSoftware Engineer · Onsite
MediumSoftware EngineerOnsiteBehavioral & Leadership

Last updated

Hiring manager question asking why a team built a system in-house when existing industry solutions were available. It tests build-versus-buy reasoning about scale, cost and fit, honest accounting of ownership costs, and credible evidence of the candidate's own technical contribution.

In the hiring manager round, you describe a past project in which your team built its own system. The manager pushes back: the industry already has solutions that could do this job, so why did you reinvent the wheel instead of adopting one of them?

Answer as you would in the interview, using a real project of your own.

Clarifying Questions

  • Is the manager challenging the decision itself, your part in making it, or both?
  • Is it acceptable to talk about a decision you inherited and later had to defend, rather than one you made?

Hints

Hint 1

Make the alternatives real: Name the specific existing options you evaluated and the concrete criterion each one failed, rather than a general claim that none of them fit.

Hint 2

Building has a running cost: Account for what the in-house system costs to run and maintain over time, not only what it saved at the start.

Follow-up questions

  • Half-joking, the manager asks you to be honest: was the technical challenge you described actually solved by an AI tool? How do you answer, and what makes your answer credible?
  • If a mature open-source or vendor product with the same capabilities appeared today, would you migrate? What would the migration cost?
  • What did the in-house system cost to operate in its first year compared with your original estimate?
  • Who disagreed with the decision to build, and how was the disagreement resolved?