Implement multiplication without using the multiplication operator
OtherData Scientist · Technical ScreenLast updated
This question evaluates proficiency in bitwise arithmetic, integer overflow semantics, sign handling, and algorithmic efficiency for implementing multiplication without using multiplication or division operators.
Requirements:
- Handle negatives, zero, and the corner case INT_MIN * −1.
- Achieve O(log |b|) additions via shift‑and‑add (Russian peasant), not naive O(|b|) repeated addition.
- Assume 32‑bit signed ints. First implement unchecked overflow (two’s‑complement wrap), then a safe version that saturates to INT_MAX/INT_MIN on overflow without using 64‑bit types.
- Analyze time and space complexity and prove correctness for all sign combinations.
- Provide unit tests: 0×x, 1×x, −1×x, powers of two, random pairs, INT_MAX×2, INT_MIN×2, INT_MIN×−1. Follow‑ups: how would you extend to big integers and compare with Karatsuba? What changes if the platform lacks arithmetic right shift?
Solution walkthrough is for members
Get the full walkthrough with reference code and complexity analysis, plus Kitty Coach at 300 messages a day. Hints, the code runner and community answers stay free.