Katkat

Diagnose data quality and pipeline performance issues

DatabricksData Engineer · Technical Screen

Last updated

Diagnose data quality and pipeline performance issues evaluates behavioral evidence, ownership, communication, trade-offs, and measurable outcomes in a realistic interview setting. A strong answer states assumptions, handles edge cases, explains trade-offs, and shows how to validate the result clearly.

Diagnose data quality and pipeline performance issues

Scenario

You are interviewing for a Data Solutions Architect role. A customer is using a cloud data platform (e.g., Databricks on AWS/Azure/GCP) and reports:

  • Data quality issues (incorrect/missing/duplicated records, inconsistent definitions)
  • Performance issues (slow ETL/ELT pipelines, long query times, high compute cost)

They ask: “We’re struggling with data quality and performance—how would you approach this?”

Tasks

  1. Discovery & scoping: What questions do you ask to clarify the problem and constraints?
  2. Define success: What metrics would you use for (a) data quality and (b) performance/cost? Include primary metrics and guardrails.
  3. Diagnosis plan: Describe a step-by-step approach to identify root causes (data sources, pipeline stages, storage layer, compute, governance).
  4. Solution proposal: Propose concrete technical and process changes to:
  • Improve data quality (validation, monitoring, ownership, SLAs)
  • Improve performance (storage layout, compute configuration, pipeline design)
  1. Concept check: Explain the differences between a data lake and a data warehouse, and where a lakehouse fits.
  2. Cloud considerations: What cloud concepts commonly matter in these engagements (e.g., security/IAM, networking, storage, encryption, cost)?

Deliverable

Provide a structured plan you could present to the customer (bullets are fine), including short-term mitigations and longer-term architecture/process recommendations.

Clarifying Questions to Ask

  • Clarify the role, scope, timeline, stakeholders, and what success looked like.
  • Use a real example with enough context for the interviewer to evaluate your judgment.
  • Separate your own actions from team actions and quantify the result when possible.

Follow-up questions

  • What would you do differently if the same situation happened again?
  • How did you keep stakeholders aligned when priorities changed?
  • What evidence shows that your actions changed the outcome?