Diagnose data quality and pipeline performance issues
DatabricksData Engineer · Technical ScreenLast updated
Diagnose data quality and pipeline performance issues evaluates behavioral evidence, ownership, communication, trade-offs, and measurable outcomes in a realistic interview setting. A strong answer states assumptions, handles edge cases, explains trade-offs, and shows how to validate the result clearly.
Diagnose data quality and pipeline performance issues
Scenario
You are interviewing for a Data Solutions Architect role. A customer is using a cloud data platform (e.g., Databricks on AWS/Azure/GCP) and reports:
- Data quality issues (incorrect/missing/duplicated records, inconsistent definitions)
- Performance issues (slow ETL/ELT pipelines, long query times, high compute cost)
They ask: “We’re struggling with data quality and performance—how would you approach this?”
Tasks
- Discovery & scoping: What questions do you ask to clarify the problem and constraints?
- Define success: What metrics would you use for (a) data quality and (b) performance/cost? Include primary metrics and guardrails.
- Diagnosis plan: Describe a step-by-step approach to identify root causes (data sources, pipeline stages, storage layer, compute, governance).
- Solution proposal: Propose concrete technical and process changes to:
- Improve data quality (validation, monitoring, ownership, SLAs)
- Improve performance (storage layout, compute configuration, pipeline design)
- Concept check: Explain the differences between a data lake and a data warehouse, and where a lakehouse fits.
- Cloud considerations: What cloud concepts commonly matter in these engagements (e.g., security/IAM, networking, storage, encryption, cost)?
Deliverable
Provide a structured plan you could present to the customer (bullets are fine), including short-term mitigations and longer-term architecture/process recommendations.
Clarifying Questions to Ask
- Clarify the role, scope, timeline, stakeholders, and what success looked like.
- Use a real example with enough context for the interviewer to evaluate your judgment.
- Separate your own actions from team actions and quantify the result when possible.
Follow-up questions
- What would you do differently if the same situation happened again?
- How did you keep stakeholders aligned when priorities changed?
- What evidence shows that your actions changed the outcome?
Solution walkthrough is for members
Get the full walkthrough with reference code and complexity analysis, plus Kitty Coach at 300 messages a day. Hints, the code runner and community answers stay free.